Christian Forums | CDFF Discussion Forum - CDFF | Online Community of Single Christians

Author	Thread
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 26 Mar, 2026 06:49 PM Within a city, I think an unimpeded, uninterrupted flow of traffic is best, and I designed such a model city. But people who do not practice the Golden Rule weighed heavy on my life. Of course, there were a number of people with good ideas before me that met up with the likes of Hitler and went to the grave without their ideas being made known.
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 11:47 PM Straight with parallel is better than anything with a curve in it. Curves lead to derailment of fast-moving trains. Engineers do not always slow down entering a curve or a turn on the track. The high-speed derails the vessels. Better a very straight track with traffic that only flows one way from destination to destination. But now with a.i. we can all be like "Michael Knight" in "KNIGHT RIDER" and fall asleep at the wheel and "KIT" the intelligent a.i. car will safely transport us to our destination while we nap. HOMER SIMPSON also fell asleep at the wheel while TRUCK-DRIVING in one episode of the Simpsons. But the special accident prevention feature kicked in and drove him safely to his destination. Anyway, WHY THE NEED FOR SPEED? Isn't it better to just arrive safely to a destination? One does not need hyper-speed or a hyper-loop. But the skies are better for hyper-speeds. People travel faster than the speed of sound in the skies. There is no need to travel the speed of sound over a track or on a cushion of air over a track or upon magnetic levitation over a tract. But on an episode of Ancient Aliens frozen mercury was used to create frictionless traffic of a hovering object that could travel a loop at any speed. Again, my concern is DERAILMENT. Other intelligent life forms have had their own mishaps with speed and crashes. That is sometimes how we recover and reverse engineer alien technologies. RECKLESS SPEEDS by human or alien.
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 11:24 PM U.S. President JIMMY CARTER said "55 SAVES LIVES" in his public transportation policy which marked or set our speed limit to 55 miles per hour for over a decade. Unimpeded traffic and an uninterrupted flow of traffic is a better approach to getting people to and fro. I have many such designs based on the German Autobahn. Our interstate system is also based on the German Autobahn. An unimpeded flow of traffic is better than a hyperloop system. As I stated, the faster the speed, the worse the crash. One knows they will happen. The crashes will be unforgiving.
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 11:08 PM Moreover, the faster the speed, the worse the crash. IMAGINE THAT! Already there are bullet fast trains that crash in Europe. Trains derail from hyper speeds. All fine and dandy when things go well. When things go badly, it is a high speed crash. AN UNFORGIVING HIGH-SPEED CRASH! But we all got to go sometime. The alien that crashed at Aurora, Colorado in 1897 speeding through the sky hit a windmill and died in crash. The aliens at Roswell, New Mexico also crashed his high-speed vessel and died. "THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS" "NEED FOR SPEED" - that is how James Dean died as well. It is all problematic. But it becomes another over-priced method to reduce the population as crashes and mishaps are sure to happen. There will be derailments and there will be crashes.
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 10:51 PM There is already the idea of under-earth travel and that aliens are doing this in under-earth channels in cooperation with the U.S. government. But in terms of under-earth mass transit transportation to and from major city point to other major cities, consider the cost of burrowing and consider that future wish-list for terrorists and consider natural disasters. It ain't going to happen or it is not likely to happen. We are better off being like the Jetsons.

WalkNTalk View Profile	It is the most important thing to have in common Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 05:15 PM No Christian man that knows the Bible would want you, ML. You pollute the forums with your poison and your feminist ideas. There is little any scripture in you.
WalkNTalk View Profile	Spiritual feelings versus fleshly feelings Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 04:18 PM True you have no real relationship with Jesus, ML.
WalkNTalk View Profile	Overcoming Temptation Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 04:15 PM ML tempts a number of people to divorce. FALSE TEACHERS in the church can be added to your list of sources of temptation. ML is such a person. She is a FALSE TEACHER. She discards many teachings of Jesus. Jesus speaks against divorce and speaks against marriage after divorce. ML discards the words of Jesus that she does not like and speaks against all those that speak the words of Jesus that she does not like. Jesus speaks against divorce and Jesus speaks against marriage after divorce. ML finds occasion for women to divorce their husbands. ML thinks it is then okay for women who find occasion to divorce their husbands to then marry someone else. Jesus calls this adultery, but ML says it's okay. Not ever does she want to quote the words of Jesus on the matter. Not ever does she want to look to the Bible to see what it says on the matter. She thinks that Christian women have cause for divorce so that it is okay to divorce and then to marry someone else after divorce. She hates me for speaking against divorce and repeats her hatred of men every day on this site calling men abuser of women in almost everything she writes. Daily she is tempted to write of the abusers of women for merely saying scripture verses against divorce. Not only is she tempted in such ways on a daily basis but always she thinks that there are reasons for divorce which make it okay to then marry someone else. She is always going against the teachings of Jesus on the matter. Pray for her! She teaches that it is okay
WalkNTalk View Profile	Biblical interpretation is important‼️Romans 7:2-3 says nothing about divorce and remarriage ‼️ Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 03:20 PM Luke 16:18, Jesus says, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery, and the man who marries a divorced woman commits adultery." Jesus says, Mark 10:12, "And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery." Jesus is very clear. But people like to confuse a verse and twist a verse. Jesus says Matthew 5:32, "but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery." (NAS) Jesus says, Matthew 19:9, "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.” These are popular verses to twist. People like to think that if a husband is guilty of sexual immorality that a wife can divorce her husband. No where in scripture does that occur. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 does not give it to a woman to write her husband a certificate of divorce. Nor does 1 Corinthians 7:10-11. People twist the Bible all the time. In the Bible, a woman belongs to her husband. She is bound to her husband. (Romans 7:2-3 and 1 Corinthians 7:39) Only a husband is given authority to write a certificate of divorce. Not government. Not wife. And Jesus speaks against it and calls it hardness of the heart which you full well know yet you are trying to find occasion for divorce for a woman to divorce her husband. How can Jesus be more plain? (Matthew 5:32) "but I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except for the reason of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery." Yet you are saying it is okay to marry a divorced woman. After Jesus spoke against it and tells us it is adultery to marry a divorced woman, LD says because a woman's husband committed adultery it is okay to marry a divorced woman. Jesus said that the husband causes her to commit adultery by divorcing her, but LD says adultery is okay as long as the X is at fault. These are not the words of Jesus, but of Christians who explain away the teachings of Christ. You are so very much in error. But ML is even more in Bible error than you. She really has lost her lid.
WalkNTalk View Profile	Biblical interpretation is important‼️Romans 7:2-3 says nothing about divorce and remarriage ‼️ Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 02:48 PM Little David says, "Jesus abolished the death penalty for adultery from the Mosaic law when He does not command that a spouse be put to death for committing adultery." Jesus did not abolish the death penalty for committing adultery. Instead he said, "Let he who is without sin before first to cast the stone" (John 8:7) He ushered in a time of grace. We are no longer stoning people for such offenses. We all deserve to be stoned for one offense or another. The Bible says to remember the Sabbath Day and keep it Holy. Many would be stoned to death for not keeping that. Many others would be stoned to death for misuse of God's holy name or for cursing God. So, it is a time of grace we have entered. But the commands are the same. Jesus just ushered in a time of grace. Jesus did not come to condemn the world but to save it. But we should not be fooled. The only ones to get to heaven LOVE GOD and LOVE JESUS AND GOD ABOVE ALL ELSE. Jesus says that if we love him that we will obey what he commands. (John 14:15, John 14:23, John 14:24) Jesus replied, “Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. (John 14:23) Anyone who does not love me will not obey my teaching. (John 14:24) “If you love me, keep my commands." (John 14:15) When Christians divorce when God says not to divorce, HOW MUCH LOVE IS THAT FOR CHRIST JESUS? When people marry someone else after divorce, HOW MUCH LOVE IS THAT FOR CHRIST JESUS? How much love is that for the teachings of Jesus?