Christian Forums | CDFF Discussion Forum - CDFF | Online Community of Single Christians

Author	Thread
WalkNTalk View Profile	Who wants to be perfect? Posted : 27 Mar, 2026 01:10 PM Fabulous if everyone returned to the Bible.
WalkNTalk View Profile	It is important to have the same core values Posted : 27 Mar, 2026 01:08 PM Fabulous if everyone returned to the Bible.
WalkNTalk View Profile	JOSEPH SMITH and LDS Posted : 27 Mar, 2026 08:51 AM That said, is polygyny wrong? Or just wrong the way the Mormons taught it? IS PLURAL MARRIAGE WRONG? Or just wrong the way that the Mormons taught it?
WalkNTalk View Profile	JOSEPH SMITH and LDS Posted : 27 Mar, 2026 08:49 AM I think that Joseph Smith was a man of the flesh who created a new religion off an old religion and Brigham Young being a man of the flesh welcomed following that religion and adding to it. Plainly, I believe that both were FALSE TEACHERS. Were they wrong in everything they taught? No. They were both right that polygyny or PLURAL MARRIAGE is in the Bible. But they were wrong about it. Was David's sin having more than one wife or having someone else's wife? 2 Samuel 12:8-9, God said to David, "I gave your master’s house to you, and your master’s wives into your arms. I gave you all Israel and Judah. And if all this had been too little, I would have given you even more. Why did you despise the word of the Lord by doing what is evil in his eyes? You struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and took his wife to be your own. You killed him with the sword of the Ammonites." Like David, Joseph Smith did not sin in having more than one wife. But he did sin in having other men's wives. It is in LDS history that Joseph Smith had other men's wives. That is adultery. Joseph Smith was going by the flesh and not by Bible teachings when advancing his New Religion that he created. He little knew the Bible than created a New Religion out from an Old Religion. When he saw opportunity to gratify the flesh, he did without sticking to the scripture, he took something from the Bible and polluted it. In the Bible, a man is not to have another man's wife, and Joseph Smith took a few women that were other men's wives. He did this while the woman's husband was still alive as David had done in the matter of Bathsheba. Something that God is against. While the Mormon church is right that polygyny is in the Bible, they were wrong in how they went about it. The foundation of Mormonism is false teachings and false prophets. That is obvious to the rest of Christendom. Yet, all of Christendom parts from the Bible and goes further and further away from the Bible all of the time.
WalkNTalk View Profile	Who wants to be perfect? Posted : 27 Mar, 2026 07:41 AM People are farther and farther from the Bible all the time.

WalkNTalk View Profile	The Bible demands that a woman must be in submission to man. Posted : 27 Mar, 2026 07:39 AM I don't think that anyone will return to the scripture any time soon.
WalkNTalk View Profile	Any good Mormon women here? Posted : 26 Mar, 2026 06:51 PM Any good Mormon women here?
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 26 Mar, 2026 06:49 PM Within a city, I think an unimpeded, uninterrupted flow of traffic is best, and I designed such a model city. But people who do not practice the Golden Rule weighed heavy on my life. Of course, there were a number of people with good ideas before me that met up with the likes of Hitler and went to the grave without their ideas being made known.
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 11:47 PM Straight with parallel is better than anything with a curve in it. Curves lead to derailment of fast-moving trains. Engineers do not always slow down entering a curve or a turn on the track. The high-speed derails the vessels. Better a very straight track with traffic that only flows one way from destination to destination. But now with a.i. we can all be like "Michael Knight" in "KNIGHT RIDER" and fall asleep at the wheel and "KIT" the intelligent a.i. car will safely transport us to our destination while we nap. HOMER SIMPSON also fell asleep at the wheel while TRUCK-DRIVING in one episode of the Simpsons. But the special accident prevention feature kicked in and drove him safely to his destination. Anyway, WHY THE NEED FOR SPEED? Isn't it better to just arrive safely to a destination? One does not need hyper-speed or a hyper-loop. But the skies are better for hyper-speeds. People travel faster than the speed of sound in the skies. There is no need to travel the speed of sound over a track or on a cushion of air over a track or upon magnetic levitation over a tract. But on an episode of Ancient Aliens frozen mercury was used to create frictionless traffic of a hovering object that could travel a loop at any speed. Again, my concern is DERAILMENT. Other intelligent life forms have had their own mishaps with speed and crashes. That is sometimes how we recover and reverse engineer alien technologies. RECKLESS SPEEDS by human or alien.
WalkNTalk View Profile	ENERGY NEEDS Posted : 25 Mar, 2026 11:24 PM U.S. President JIMMY CARTER said "55 SAVES LIVES" in his public transportation policy which marked or set our speed limit to 55 miles per hour for over a decade. Unimpeded traffic and an uninterrupted flow of traffic is a better approach to getting people to and fro. I have many such designs based on the German Autobahn. Our interstate system is also based on the German Autobahn. An unimpeded flow of traffic is better than a hyperloop system. As I stated, the faster the speed, the worse the crash. One knows they will happen. The crashes will be unforgiving.