In my opinion, nations go to war for two reasons #1 so greedy men can enrich themselves and #2 To stop thoes greedy men.
As for the first reason,
The Rothchild family owns nearly every central bank in the word and they have financed both sides of every war since Napoleon. That family controls major swaths of the government and media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWxJBDPkn0A
(disclaimer I only watched about 11:00 minuets of the above video)
However lets talk about reason #2 about why wars are fought. Reason #1 is like that guy that shows his false courage by placing his hand in a door that is slamming shut. In dramatic fashion the guy smoothly pulls his hand to safety moments before the door slams shut.
The state of the Union might have appeared like past speeches, but during the address the 'brave' guys were not used to an unseen force controlling the door as it snapped shut and guess who got there hand caught in the door.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/E5mQAawr-KM
In the past 'slick Randy' was not preforming magic instead Randy was sowing confusion so everybody knew that someone passed gas but everyone used to blame the wrong guy.
As obviously seen fighting a war to stop the greedy men is very diffrent than the wars before.
To provide proof of the fact that the war in Iran is diffrent than the wars that came before it...consider this previously some Middle Eastern countries did not like each other so much they would blame someone for passing gas but still they would not have a united front, during this war countries are saying I dont care if my former nemesis is involved in a fight, let me get in there!
(time stamp 3:32)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhbZWhIQNGo
Allow me to emphasize the phrase "whats going on is not a normal war"
I think that around 90% of people on this website feel similar concerning Iran
Posted : 2 Mar, 2026 05:51 PM
Not only does Iran want to kill Americans, the 'religious-death cult' that runs their country wants to "bathe the world in blood" (they think that will hasten the return of their messanic figure that sort of sounds like the anti-christ)
The Iranian leadership has held thoes beliefs for about 50 years.
But I am speaking about the everyday man on the street, I question the mentality of the Americans that can see that Iran wants to light the world on fire, however thoes people think that Iran should be left alone?
-Just one in four Americans say they back US strikes on Iran, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds-
I am a God fearing man that Loves peace, with that being said I understand that the lives of some people are made possible only at the expense of the hardship of others. From my understanding some of the 'leadership' in Iran was more trouble than what they were worth.
That is the foundation of the following statement: "Congratulations"
-Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei killed in strikes, led theocratic regime for decades-
I suppose the deep state rats/snakes are sweating bullets because another one of there 'strong defensive men' has fallen Allow me to confirm the rumors "Yes things for them are about to go from bad to worse!"
I appreciate how you have noted how "Christian Dating for Free" is barely free anymore. At this stage in my life I enjoy speaking in the group chats, and that part is free...for now ;)
This all shows people that the deep state rats have been forced onto an old piece of wood that has been set on fire...and the rats are growing more and more desperate.
Speaking of hypocrisy, the democrats (although the real bad guys are the people that globalists that wants to erase any national pride)
But for the last several years the bad guys have been running around like monkeys and the monkey behavior has existed just beyond the reach of the good guys. However last night at The state of The Union address many of the bad actors were easily seen.
It was almost nauseating to witness, at one point president Trump address the crowd and said something like 'I would like everyone who wants to protect Americans to stand up' (I would estimate about 90-95% of democratic policy makers did not stand)
The "U.S.A. chant" broke out a couple times and one democrat policy maker had a smirk on her face as she chanted "KKK", I think she was the lady that was wearing a pin that said "F... ICE" (ICE = imigration and customes enforcment)
NYC is expecting a major snow storm and they are not wanting a repeat of the cities disastrous responce to the last snow storm, so there mayor is asking for backup snow shovelers.
I am able to understand that a person needs to be able to show some form of identification in order to be employed by the city, but what is not understood is why the democratic mayor sees the need for workers to present identification if they want to work but he does not thin people need identification if they want to participate in U.S. elections.
-Democrats often oppose voter ID laws because they believe these laws can disenfranchise minority voters and are not effective in preventing voter fraud, which is extremely rare. They argue that such laws create unnecessary barriers to voting, particularly for low-income and marginalized groups.-
The simple truth is that democrats need ,the type of people that do not have a form of identification, to be able to vote. What kinds of people have a difficult time obtaining some form of identification...people that have not gone through the proper channels to be in America these are the kind of folks that the democrats need to vote or else democrats can not "win" the elections.
Plus people that teach that it is acceptable to harm an unborn baby without cause, their logic is twisted.
Who do people think funds a persons retirement? The point is that if 1,000 babies are killed, then 1,000 workers exit the workforce? If people accept abortion then they should also accept a poor economy.
There is one rule, and the rule is that we must Love our neighbors. If we follow this rule things just work. However there is some people that want things to go smothly but they do not want to Love there neighbors.
Despite the fact that bad actors exist inside The United States, on the grand scale your going to have more business sucess inside The U.S.A. than what you will have in Afganistan. The higher rate of sucess is due to the fact that in America we have rules that are designed to cause people to not 'hurt' each other.
It is understandable that people that do not want to Love each other thoes people want to remain outside The U.S.A. but they want to conduct business via the USA.
Basicly the purpose of a tarrif is to protect people. In the 1960's Fidel Castro was treating the Cuban people badly and he (evidently) knew that he was going to wreck his countries ecconomy, so he thought 'I will treat the Cuban people badly and then sell goods inside The USA. Fortunatly John F Kenedy and other men put heavy trade restrictions on Cuban goods. If someone tries to treat US citizens badly the same type of financial restraints are still passed out.
I ask the reader to think through the process, whenever you read a headline that says tarrifs think "who is being protected from being hurt"
Say Jim Sr. worked at a car maker plant, one day the plant shut down and relocated to another contry. Now Jim Sr. has a dificult time providing for his family. Meanwhile the car is made in another country and then sold back to US citizens. The country that the car was made in recieves the sales tax from the sell. Everybody wins except Jim Sr., and also all the stores that Jim would have shoped at if he still had his good paying job.
(I almost run the risk of beating a dead horse) but I will say it 'For a long time bad people have thought that The USA citizens could afford to pay the bill for the rest of the world.
I will roll my eyes at the thought but if you make more than say $8,000 per year then you are rich (compared to the worlds advrage)
When I hear people complaining about tarrifs, basicly that person is not thinking about the abuse of humans that is being stoped.
Let me give a real quick financial runown, if your a salesman The US ecconomy is the big kid on the block (acording to the following metric) The USA ecconomy is almost twice as valuable as #2
Allow me to confirm the rumors "Yes things for them are about to go from bad to worse!" 