Admin
|
Canfield On C.I. Scofield and His 1909 Reference Bible
Posted : 15 Nov, 2012 08:17 AM
Canfield On C.I. Scofield and His 1909 Reference Bible
Joseph M. Canfield wrote a book on C.I. Scofield and his Reference Bible, called "The Incredible Scofield and His Book," 1988. However, Canfield apparently became a Preterist. But his work on Scofield tends to be scholarly, with careful research done on important points.
Scofield was offered a membership
in the Lotus Club of New York, a prestigious club in the literary
circles of the United States catering to non-Christians. This was not
a club in which one applied for membership, rather, you had to be
invited and have a sponsor. The answer to how Scofield got into the club, Canfield shows, was Samuel Untermeyer (1858-1941).
On pages pages 173 to 175 of The Incredible Scofield, Canfield focuses on the evidence in existence about C.I. Scofield's unlikely membership in the artistic and literary exclusive New York Lotos Club.
"The other act of 1901 was one that, according to the principles of he
Brethren, should have made J.N. Darby spin in his grave. Scofield was
admitted to membership in the Lotos Club in New York City. Now such a
step was in complete conflict with the standard Plymouth Brethren
working interpretation of II Cor 6: 14, "Be ye not equally yoked
together with unbelievers."
The Lotos Club is an exclusive club of a sort more common in London,
as so often described in British literature. The phenomenon, while
present in the United States, has never developed on this side of the
Atlantic to the extent it did in England...The club's purpose as noted
in Article I, Section II of its Constitution, was:
"The primary object of this Club shall be to promote social
intercourse among journalists, artists, and members of the musical and
dramatic professions, and representatives, amateurs, and friends of
Literature, Science, and the Fine Arts..."...
"The Club's Literacy Committee, when Scofield's application was
presented, included Samuel Untermeyer (1858-1941), a notorious
criminal lawyer. Untermeyer's accomplishments, described in Who's Who
in America take up more than two columns. There is not one activity
listed which would suggest that Untermeyer could have appreciated
either Scofield's Bible Correspondence Course or his magazine
The-Believer. Unteremeyer's life was so remote from the circles in
which Scofield normally moved, that we must remain amazed that
Untermeyer would have given Schofield the "white ball" rather than the
"black ball." A possible clue - Schofield's "postponed Kingdom"
theory (of which more anon - many Christians hold that theory to be
without Scriptural basis) was most helpful in Getting Fundamental
Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer's
pet projects - the Zionist Movement...
"It defies understanding that an "obscure" pastor from the
hinterlands, whose literary output up to 1901 consisted of very
sectarian booklets, articles and courses, would be considered
acceptable in the Lotos Club. Indications are that had Reid or Samuel
Untermeyer seen any of Scofield's works, they would have reacted with
raucous laughter. Scofield kept up his membership in Lotis until his
death in 1921. The membership was not referred to in any obituary or
eulogy. (The dispensational community knew nothing of it!) The Club
was given as Scofield's residence in 1912 in Who's Who in America.
The 1905 letter to Gaebelein was written on the Lotis Club
stationery."
Canfield writes, "The selection of Scofield for admission to the Lotos Club, which
could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion
which has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of
C.I. Scofield. Such direction probably was motivated by concerns
remote from fidelity to the person, work and truth of Jesus Christ."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Untermyer "Samuel Untermeyer[
was a Jewish-American lawyer and civic leader as well as a self-made
millionaire....Untermyer advocated the Zionist liberation movement and
was President of the Keren Hayesod, the agency through which the
movement was then and still is conducted in America.[9]......
Canfield says "...the Bible project was not originally based on the
support of a broad spectrum of the Christian constituency. It was
supported from a select group who were economically able to finance
special ideas and ride ideological hobbies." He is talking about Scofield's Reference Bible.
Again, Canfield says "The selection of Scofield for admission to the Lotos Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion which has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield. Such direction probably was motivated by concerns remote from fidelity to the person, work and truth of Jesus Christ."
My comment: Without that directing and help, Scofield's probably would not have
gotten his Reference Bible published by Oxford University Press, whose
prestige helped sell the book and its ability to transmit the
dispensationalist man-made theological system to millions of American and English Christians
since 1909. And many American dispensationalist missionaries to other
nations have planted dispensationalist churches in other lands. The
publication of the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909 is one one date in history that
marks the beginning of the spread of dispensationalism, and its process of becoming the dominant theology in the evengelical denominations, a leavening going on over time (Luke 13: 21). Another possible date would be the earlier Niagra Bible Conferences held annually from 1876 to 1897. The Conferences helped to establish dispensationalism in the United States.
Post Reply
|