Devolution vs Evolution

Posted : 6 Jun, 2010 07:47 PM

Devolution works but evolution doesn't. :boxing:



Devolution assumes only one thing: the original genetically pure breeding pair was created



Devolution is subject to all the laws and processes of nature.



Devolution explains the origin of the species -- not evolution.



***



Okay, let's keep this debate simple.



A machine takes in an input, processes it, and produces an output



All machines will eventually break down.



Machines do not become increasingly complex by random events, minute changes over long periods of time.



A Machine can only become more complex by deliberate, intelligent, action.



These are all obvious.



But here's the thing.....



The simplest organism or simple cell, is a machine.....a "biological" machine.



A human being is a machine that is made up of billions of machines working precisely with each other.



Evolution -- without deliberate/intelligent input -- goes all the obvious.



So Devotion works and Evolution doesn't



There had to be a creator to make the first perfect 'biological' machines :yay:



Note: It would be better that we creationist use the term DEVOLUTION instead of 'intelligent design" for argument sake.