Author | Thread |
---|---|
BioBlind
View Profile |
Am I missing something?Posted : 2 Apr, 2016 09:12 PMCould be any number of things really. Could be a game, sure. My first thought was that he doesn't know what to say, likely disagrees with you, but doesn't want to throw it in your face. The anonymity afforded by being on a website makes it easy to simply walk away without having to say difficult or potentially hurtful things. He keeps checking out your profile? Might be considering if he should go through with it? Maybe hoping you've changed your stance on the topic and noted it in said profile?
|
|
|
BioBlind
View Profile |
why?Posted : 2 Apr, 2016 08:58 PMMight it have something to do with general Biblical illiteracy?
|
BioBlind
View Profile |
Devolution vs EvolutionPosted : 4 Jun, 2011 07:04 PMThe word "evolution" has taken on a lot of connotations in the world in which we live. If I were to get into an argument with an Evolutionist, we'd probably both agree that evolution is a force of nature that functions on our planet. However, an Evolutionist and a Christian SHOULD disagree on the particulars. An Evolutionist will tell you that evolution, given enough time, can create more complexity than previously existed. Like has been touched on in this thread already, Christians should understand that evolution does in fact lead to change in a population over time ... although not by increasing the amount of information (DNA) available before. Look at the dog; Noah took aboard the ark some dogs that carried the genes for long legs, short legs, long fur, short fur, red fur, black fur, brown fur, low intelligence and lower intelligence still. And why shouldn't God have created His creatures to have just the genes needed to survive in a variety of environments? Heck, if *I* were to create creatures to inhabit a world that changed, I'd hope I'd have given them the genes to adapt along with it. ... although maybe He forgot the "extra survival genes" for the unicorns, which is why we don't see any around anymore? :ROFL: The point though, is that no matter how many poor genes we select for, no matter how rat-like, how diminutive and puntable a chihuahua is, it's still a dog, not a new species. The genes for the chihuahua existed on the ark, it just took some cruel humans and a whole lot of inbreeding to bring those genes out.
|