Author | Thread: Jonah's Fish | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
DontHitThatMark
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 29 May, 2014 11:39 AMJust curious what people think about this. Do you think the fish that swallowed Jonah was literally a fish? Or could it have been described as a fish by someone who didn't understand what it really was? There are other places in the bible that describe things which are similar to our own concepts of technology and machines, except they're described by people who aren't able to fully understand or characterize what they're seeing, so they relate it to things that are familiar to them, such as animals. For example, when the Native Americans observed and attempted to described trains and locomotives, they compared them to iron horses. So, was Jonah's fish simply a fish, or some kind of heavenly submarine that Jonah compared to a fish because there was no other way for him to describe it? I'm fully aware that God can "prepare a great fish", which is exactly like normal fish, with gills and digestive fluid, etc. However, that seems like a much more problematic solution for God to choose, and it's terribly difficult to explain how a man survived in the belly of a fish for 3 days. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 29 May, 2014 03:35 PMInteresting concept...however...God hasnt...that I know of spoakin to a "maned submarine" and command it to vomit... :) xo |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 29 May, 2014 05:45 PMIt's possible that Jonah was taken aboard a craft he would not have been familiar with. What would have been in it's "belly" that made him so miserable? Or how would God have prepared a fish for him? Since it's purpose was not to eat him it would not have been able to digest him. If the fish was an herbivore it would not have the means to create stomach acid that would break down meat. It often requires hydrochloric acid in humans to digest meat. Vegetables molecules are loosely bonded and break down much more easily than animal proteins so a strong acid is not required for them. If the fish was large enough it might have taken three days for it to become sick enough to vomit Jonah out. |
|||
Maniacs1
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 29 May, 2014 09:32 PMSomething else to ponder is that at the time they had a broader definition of the word fish, meaning that what we would define as marine mammels (whales, sharkes, etc) they more than likely just lumped in with "fish". there are some marine animals that are/used to be able to swallow large amounts of food at a time (i say used to because many are extinct now (and by swallow large amounts of food i also mean that they had fairly large mouths, so it would be possible for some species of marine life to swallow a person whole, granted there arent very many now, if any due to natural or man made reasons)), so it is possible that it was a "fish" but not in the ways that we define fish nowadays. |
|||
DontHitThatMark
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 30 May, 2014 01:24 PMPersonally, I would think that being in total darkness inside of a "thing" that you have never encountered before would be terrifying, kind of like if a locomotive was barreling past a native american. I'd be pretty scared. Jonah doesn't describe cesspit of digestive juices(I sure would mention that), and "vomiting" is also just another description of an action of something by a person who doesn't understand what they're seeing. If you drove a car through the amazon jungle and past a tribe of untouched natives, they'd probably say something along the lines of "it runs very fast with no legs", and if people started getting out of the car, they might describe it as "carrying people in it's belly". My only real point here is to be able to at least tell people that I don't know what exactly it was that swallowed Jonah, and limiting it to a description by people who recounted it second hand from a man who had no idea what was going on, probably doesn't give me any logical evidence to say that it had to literally be a fish/whale/shark, because if it was a fish/whale/shark, it becomes difficult to explain to someone who has no"religious" experience. I mean, for the first 25 years of my life, I've never given it a second thought. Jonah was swallowed by a fish prepared by God, I didn't think I "needed" much more explanation. For a person who has no understanding of God or the bible, it's an entirely different perspective. So in explaining these things to people, I think it sort of falls under the "become weak to those who are weak" concept. Yes, it could be a literal fish, and God's power sustained Jonah. Yes, it could also be something that is much easier for a human to breath/cry out/survive in for three days. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 30 May, 2014 02:46 PMShared ~ I've just noticed that if I would choose to insist that it was literally a fish, I'd hit brick walls. If I leave it open to more reasonable and realistic interpretations, people become intensely interested and start asking all kinds of questions, like suddenly God becomes a possibility in their minds. |
|||
|
||||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 30 May, 2014 06:42 PMHello everyone: |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 1 Jun, 2014 11:13 AMGNWS put it just about as I would have!!! I thought Id see how some of the rest of the saints responded first. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 1 Jun, 2014 06:01 PMHey Hidden: |
|||
DontHitThatMark
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 2 Jun, 2014 06:15 AMI am not denying God's power, and I'm not saying that it wasn't a fish. To a person who has absolutely no faith in God, saying that it could have been something like the beast/machine that was described in the account of Ezekiel is much more believable than a big gold fish, and it does not blaspheme God's word. For all we know, it would require more of God's power to use a "godly submarine" than for him use a literal fish. A rigid approach to an unknown is not wise, all we can say for sure is that God is powerful enough to do whatever He chooses, and that's exactly what He did in Jonah's experience. I just think that more people would believe Jonah's story literally if they did not have to accept the rigid view that He was breathing the digestive juices of a whale(sorry, it couldn't be a whale, had to be a fish:ribbit:). I would say that since the bible does note that God took the time to "prepare a great fish", that it was uniquely designed and able to hold a human inside it for 3 days, so I think it's more logical to believe that it was not any fish we've ever seen, and probably did not have the biological functions that would kill a human in it's "stomach". |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Jonah's FishPosted : 8 Jun, 2014 10:31 AMWhat does Ellen White have to say on it? :ROFL: |
First | Page : 1 2 | Next 2 >> | Last |