Author Thread: Wanted: Apathetic Lutherans and Calvinists.........
Admin


Wanted: Apathetic Lutherans and Calvinists.........
Posted : 15 Jan, 2012 02:33 PM

"For as God alone can properly bear witness to� His own

words, so those words cannot obtain full credit in the heart

until they are sealed by the inward testimony of the Spirit.

The same Spirit who spoke by the mouth of the prophets

must penetrate our hearts, in order to convince us that they

faithfully delivered the message with which they were

divinely entrusted. ."

John Calvin





"Religious muddle around us is frantic and furious. How

urgently we need, in these days, to get clear about the Holy

Spirit!"

J.l Packer







About seventeen years ago, my brother, then an assistant

football coach at Arizona State University, introduced me to

Danny White, who was at the time the star quarterback for

the Sun Devils. I was only twelve years old and in awe of

White. Meeting him was one of those moments when you

are aware of every movement you make, of every nervous

gesture. As we walked toward him on the football field

where he was running, I would feel my feet become lead.

Fear grippeq me and I almost wanted to go back, but there

was no turning back now. With a dry throat and clumsy

handshake I met White-just when my brother announced

that he needed to take care of some business with the

trainer. So here we were, Danny White and this awkward

teenager who was unusually short on words. But Danny

immediately broke the tension when he said, "Hey, Horts,

how about a few passes?" "What's he talking about?" 1

wondered, concerning what would be a fairly straightforward

invitation were I not so nervous. "You mean passes to

a game?" "No," he replied, "I mean throwing some passes

here on the field for awhile;" For the next twenty minutes or

so there we were, Danny White and Mike Horton, thro~ing

the ball around and getting to know each other-not just as

a fan gets to know a hero by following his career, but as one

person gets to know another.



Since then, I have had the opportunity to meet some

other people who make me feel pretty nervous: other sports

stars, actors, writers, and a few foreign dignitaries. But no

meeting presents a greater challenge than when we meet

God in the person of the Holy Spirit. It is a wonderful

opportunity, to be sure, but it is also a challenge. We do just

fine in the stands, shaking our heads at the unbelievable

skill and energy of the Holy Spirit, and we follow His work

closely through the years. But to actually meet Him? To get

to know Him, not just as an aw&struck fan meets a celebrity,

but as two friends out on the field together?

We often findsuch intimacy beyond what we can (or should even attempt to) reach.



But it is at God's invitation that we leave the

stands, walk out to the field, and befriend Him through the

person of the Holy Spirit.

God the Father longs to have a relationship with us. He

loved the world so much that "He gave His one and only

Son" so long ago to save us. When God the Son took on flesh,

suffered, died, and rose again, He brought us everlasting

peace with God. If it were not for the Holy Spirit, we would

still be up in the stands, unrelated to God as anything other

than an admiring fan. It is through God the Holy Spirit that

the Father's initiative in Christ-adoption and reconciliation-

is finally fulfilled. It is He who brings us into the

benefits planned for us by the Father and purchased for us

by the Son.



The Reformation tradition, while eschewing the fanaticism

of "those who think they've swallowed the Holy Spirit,

feathers and all" (Luther's phrase), recovered the legitimate

biblical teaching concerning the Spirit by focusing

their lens once again on His role as the one who reveals

Christ, illumines our souls to understand the Word, and

enables us to believe it and to repent of everything that

stands up to challenge it. In fact, Calvin has been called "the

theologian of the Holy Spirit," not, of course, because he

instructed the third person of the Trinity, but because so

much of his emphasis falls on the work of the Holy Spirit in

bringing us into union with Christ and communicating to us

the benefits of that union. In the remainder of this article, I

want to challenge us all to return to the classical doctrine of

the Trinity as we attempt to recover what we who claim to

be heirs of the Reformation have lost concerning the person

and work of the Holy Spirit in our day.



Back to the Trinity



There is only one God. On that Christians and Jews (as well as Muslims) are agreed. But the Father is God, the Son

is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. Yet, there are not three

Gods, but one. The biblical writers do not explain this

apparent contradiction, but affirm it nonetheless. In the

second century, the church father Tertullian came up with

the phrase, one in essence, three in person and the term

trinitas (trinity) was employed for the first time to explain

the relationship of those two affirmations: three persons

(tri); one God (unity).

And yet, this staggering mystery has proved easier to

affirm in public worship than in personal faith. In every age

the church seems to carve up the Trinity and emphasize

one person of the Godhead above the others. Sometimes

this is done to redress imbalances, but it often results in

other imbalances.



In our day, many hyper-Calvinists are so fascinated with

the sovereignty of God that the person and work of the Son

and the Holy Spirit get short shrift, while many hyperLutherans

and Barthians risk ~mbracing a form of

Christomonism, in which the Father and the Spirit are

footnotes to the person and work of Christ.



Like the sovereignty of God for hyper-Calvinists, justification for hyperLutherans can become not only the central doctrine (after

all, it must occupy that spot for all evangelicals), but the

only doctrine in the system, divesting the biblical message

of its fullness, driving the Father and the Spirit into the

shadows, and leaving the flock unbalanced and malnourished.

In the meantime, the charismatic movement has brought

much attention to the reality of the third person of the

Godhead, while often underplaying the study of the divine

attributes and the objective character of Christ's person

and work.



It's not doctrine that concerns most charismatics,

as it concerns most Calvinists and Lutherans, but experience.

So, the Holy Spirit becomes the central trinitarian figure. Just as the Holy Spirit's person and work can be

ignored when we emphasize only the objective side of

salvation (the Father and Son's work outside of us in history),

so also it is true that the Father's and Son's saving

work can be pushed aside in an obsession with the real and

alleged experiences and gifts of the Holy Spirit. But for us

Reformation Christians, emphasizing the objective character

of salvation in the face of so much subjective introspection

and emotionalism, we risk keeping the work of Christ

external and "outside us." What the Reformers meant by

emphasizing Christ's saving work "outside" and "external"

to us was that our justification does not refer to inner

renewal by the Spirit or the life of Christ within us, but to the

once-and-for-all work of Christ for us. Nevertheless, as

Calvin wrote,



"It is not enough to have Christ working

outside of us for our salvation unless this gift becomes ours

and is brought into us by the Holy Spirit."



There must be a

spiritual union with Christ if we are to receive the blessings.

There must be faith if we are to be justified, sanctified, and

glorified, and this faith we have by virtue of our union with

Christ, the gift of the Holy Spirit.

What we desperately need, then, is a return to a practical,

real-life, realization of the doctrine of the Trinity in our daily

thinking: God the Father so loved the world that He gave

Christ to His people and His people to Christ; then the

Father and the Son sent the Holy Spirit. If the person and

work of any member of the Trinity are overlooked or underplayed

then to that degree we will be unbalanced Christians.



The Shy Member of the Trinity



The Holy Spirit, often called the "shy member of the

Trinity" because He does not draw attention to Himself, but

chiefly to Christ, is not, therefore, an impersonal "force" or

appendage to the Godhead, but the vibrant, life-giving,renewing partner of the Father and the Son, whose essence

He shares. As the Father has assigned to the Son a name

which is above every other name, so Jesus Himself declared,

"It is good that I go~ for if I go I will send the

Comforter." In other words, Jesus measures the importance

of the Holy Spirit's coming by the fact that it will compensate

for the loss of His leaving. But our Lord further states,

"It is He who testifies concerning Me." The Holy Spirit is

essential in the redemptive mission, but He does not "blow

His own horn." Rather, He trumpets the glories of Christ's

person and work.



I worry that the charismatic movement,

generally speaking, misses this chief role of the Holy Spirit

by trying to make Him the center of attention. The Holy

Spirit refuses to be center stage, and any group or movement

that seeks to put Him there gravely misses the point

of His mission.



But if our Reformation tradition has erred, especially of

late-and it has-it has been on the side of denying experience,

subjectivity, emotion, and the application of redemption.

Sanctification, inner renewal, life in the Spirit, victory

over sin-because these have been so emphasized, twisted,

disfigured, misinterpreted and misapplied in our day, we

risk becoming cynical about some very holy matters, quenching

the same Spirit who brought us everything Christ purchased

for us. While we find it easy (and too often delightful)

to apply to charismatics the apostle Paul's lament,



"Theyare zealous for God, but their zeal is not based on knowledge,"



can anything be said in favor of knowledge without

zeal? In fact, which is the more inexcusable offense: serving

God in spite of poor theology, or ignoring Him in spite of

better?

In every great move of God in His church, reformation

(doctrinal purification) and revival (spiritual renewal and

awakening) have gone hand-in-hand. In the Reformation,

Luther was hardly afraid of the Holy Spirit. The German Reformer wrote,



"Without the Holy Spirit hearts are either hardened in sins or

they despair .... Now, this is the article which must ever be

and remain in operation; for creation is an established fact,

and redemption, too, is finished. But the Holy Spirit carries

on His work without ceasing until the Last Day ...."



In Calvin's crest there is a hand holding out a heart, with

the inscription, "Behold, I offer you my heart, promptly and

Sincerely." The divorce between doctrine and piety, the

mind and the heart, characteristic of both orthodox Reformation

folk today on one side and pietists and charismatics

on the other, is a course for disaster, not for either reformation

or revival.





Reformation without revival can change the way we

think, but it will never transform our attitudes, feelings, and

actions. It will be a short-lived mid flight correction. Revival

without reformation cannot happen in any case, for revival

is the sovereign work of the Spirit of God, and He will not

bless with revival a church that refuses to conform its

teaching and preaching to the Word of God. The First Great

Awakening in the eighteenth century was great because it

called the colonies back to the Reformation truths and

encouraged people to make those truths their own in an

experiential, personal way. Combining the mind and the

heart, Edwards, Whitefield, and others used the Word of

God to bring the whole person into confrontation with the

truth and presence of God's Spirit.



Conclusion



The Heidelberg Catechism has the right idea. After every

major doctrine, it asks, "How does this comfort you?"

Sometimes we get so caught up in defending particular

doctrines and frustrated at being told so often, "But doctrine

isn't practical," that we stop trying to answer that question, "How does this comfort you?" Our own tradition

calls us back to go beyond rehearsing doctrinal formulae

and formal terms-not to ignore them, but to go beyond

them, to take these great truths on board and use them in

daily life. Further, the Westminster Shorter Catechism answers

that the chief end of man is "to glorify God and to

enjoy Him forever." Glorify, sure. That's a word we orthodox

folk can understand. But enjoy? That's a bit too emotional.

To experience God is a delight that only children

enjoy. Like an awestruck fan, it's more comfortable to

glorify God from the stands than to enjoy Him on the field.

But let's not settle for anything less than God's very best.





Author

Michael S. Horton is president of CURE and the author of

Made in America and Putting Amazing Back Into Grace. He is

editor of the best-sellers The Agony of Deceit and Power

Religion. He is presently completing doctoral studies at

Wycliffe Hall, Oxford. He serves as an advisory council

member for Reformation & Revival Ministries.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Wanted: Apathetic Lutherans and Calvinists.........
Posted : 15 Jan, 2012 06:44 PM

There is no self exaltation in the body of Christ, there is no man made tag that has any merit with the God of the word, when you reject his word you reject him it is very simple.



It is the same story we see in the Garden, the father is not looking for those that make their own doctrine to fit their liking he is looking for those that accept him by accepting his word, no man that say he has the ability to intepret the word of God is walking in the light of the word.



Until you put The lord Jesus first no one has anything.

Post Reply

dljrn04

View Profile
History
Wanted: Apathetic Lutherans and Calvinists.........
Posted : 16 Jan, 2012 04:53 AM

Excellent article James. Ptaise God. May we glorify him and enjoy him forever.

Post Reply