Author | Thread: Doctrines of man's theology | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Admin ![]() |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 31 Dec, 2012 04:34 AMDefine God's word. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 1 Jan, 2013 04:02 PMLet's stay focused and not make this into something it is not. Own your words please. I was responding to the questions you asked. You clearly implied that we don't really know what God's wrath actually looks like. I even just gave you an example. I'm not sure why that's not good enough and why you would rather make this about personal attacks on me. If you still aren't getting your questions answered then maybe you should do as I've already suggested and clarify what you are asking because you are being extremely vague and contradictory. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 1 Jan, 2013 04:06 PMI have asked my questions and had my say now it is time to move some other way. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 1 Jan, 2013 04:08 PMI think so |
|||
DontHitThatMark
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 4 Jan, 2013 09:42 AMI've never seen the bible say "God is wrath". I believe that the wrath of God exists only as long as sin exists, so technically, wrath is not part of God's nature any more than sin is, since it doesn't exist without sin. I think the metaphor of God "filling up" and "pouring out" a cup of wrath(not a wrath cup) is indicative of that, since once the wrath is poured out, the cup is empty of wrath. Wrath is only God's character's reaction to sin, and in that sense, not an attribute built into his character. God is eternally righteous, not eternally wrathful. God is wrathful toward any unrighteousness or sin because He is righteous, but when sin ceases to exist, so does the wrath against it. Wrath is a reaction, not an attribute. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 4 Jan, 2013 10:28 AMSo basically anything anyone does can be seen as a reaction to their character and not their character? Why are we acting as if wrath is some type of evil? |
|||
|
||||
DontHitThatMark
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 4 Jan, 2013 05:57 PMA reaction OF their character. Wrath is not evil, but having a wrathful character is. Wrath in the bible is always temporary and conditional, pointed directly at the thing causing the discord, and it disappears when the sinful act is punished or forgiven. It is not an attribute of his character, it is a reaction of his character. When sin is gone, God's wrath will be gone. I'm not saying wrath is bad, I'm just saying that it is not part of who God is, I believe it's part of what he does because of who he is. |
|||
DontHitThatMark
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 4 Jan, 2013 06:13 PM"So basically anything anyone does can be seen as a reaction to their character and not their character?" |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 4 Jan, 2013 11:56 PMLove and wrath can not dwell together. |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 5 Jan, 2013 01:54 AMSo it is OF their character correct? |
|||
![]() View Profile History |
Doctrines of man's theologyPosted : 5 Jan, 2013 01:55 AMActually wrath was always in God's plan... |
First | << Previous 10 | Page : 1 2 3 4 5 | Next 4 >> | Last |