Author Thread: None but a child of God could take up this expression.
dljrn04

View Profile
History
None but a child of God could take up this expression.
Posted : 14 Jun, 2013 02:03 AM

Psalm 119:103 How sweet are Your words to my taste! yes, sweeter than honey to my mouth.







None but a child of God could take up this expression.

Because none besides has a spiritual taste. The exercises of

David in this sacred word were delightfully varied. Its majesty

commanded his reverence. Its richness called forth his love.

Its sweetness excited his joy. Its holy light, keeping his heart

close with God, naturally endeared it to his soul. How barren

is a mere external knowledge of the Gospel! The natural man

may talk or even dispute about its precious truths. But he has

never tasted them-at least not so as to relish and feed on

them. The highest commendation cannot explain the

sweetness of honey to one who has never tasted it. Thus

nothing but experience can give a spiritual intelligence. But

what we have really tasted, we can warmly commend-"Oh!

taste and see that the Lord is good." Having once tasted of

His Divine goodness, the sweetest joys of earth will be insipid,

distasteful, and even bitter. Do we ask-what is it that gives this unutterable sweetness to

the word? Is it not that name, which "is as ointment poured

forth?" Is it not "the savor of the knowledge of Christ", that

revives the soul in every page with the breath of heaven? For

can the awakened sinner hear, that "God so loved the world,

that He gave His only-begotten Son, that whoever believes in

Him should not perish, but have everlasting life"-and not be

ready to say-How sweet are Your words to my taste! yes,

sweeter than honey to my mouth? Can the weary soul listen

to the invitation to "all that labor and are heavy-laden;" and not

feel the sweetness of those breathings of love? Who can tell

the sweetness of those precious words to the conflicting,

tempted soul-displaying the Divine sovereignty in choosing

him, the unchanging faithfulness in keeping him, and the

Almighty power of the Divine will in the gift of eternal life? And

how can the believer hear his Savior "knock at the door" of his

heart, calling him to fresh communion with Himself: and not

turn to Him with the ardent excitement of his love-"All Your

garments smell of myrrh, and aloes, and cassia, out of the

ivory palaces, whereby they have made You glad!"

But are there not times, when we gather no sweetness from

the word? It is with the spiritual, as with the natural food-a

want of appetite gives disgust, instead of sweetness and

refreshment. An indolent reading of the word without faithwithout desire-without application-or with a taste vitiated by

contact-with the things of sense-deadens the palate-"The full

soul loathes an honeycomb: but to the hungry soul every bitter

thing is sweet."

But how melancholy is the thought of the multitudes, that

hear, read, understand the word, and yet have never tasted its

sweetness! Like Barzillai, they have no sense to "discern

between good and evil." Full of the world, or of their own

conceits-feeding on the delusive enjoyments of

creaturecomforts-nourishing some baneful corruption in their bosoms-or cankered with a spirit of formality-they have no

palate for the things of God; they are "dead in trespasses and

sins." But how sweet is the word to the hungering and thirsting

taste! We eat, and are not satisfied. We drink, and long to

drink again. "If so be we have tasted that the Lord is gracious,

as new-born babes" we shall "desire the sincere milk of the

word, that we may grow thereby." We shall take heed of any

indulgence of the flesh, which may hinder the spiritual

enjoyment, and cause us to "loathe" even "angels' food" as

"light bread." Instead of resting in our present experience of its

sweetness, we shall be daily aspiring after higher relish for the

heavenly blessing. And will not this experience be a "witness

in ourselves" of the heavenly origin of the word? For what

arguments could ever persuade us that honey is bitter, at the

moment when we are tasting its sweetness? Or who could

convince us that this is the word of man, or the imposture of

deceit, when its blessed influence has imparted peace,

holiness, joy, support, and rest, infinitely beyond the power of

man to bestow? But let this enjoyment-as the spiritual

barometer-the pulse of the soul-accurately mark our progress

or decline in the Divine life. With our advancement in spiritual

health, the word will be increasingly sweet to our taste: while

our declension will be marked by a corresponding abatement

in our desires, love, and perception of its delights.



by

Charles Bridges

Post Reply



View Profile
History
None but a child of God could take up this expression.
Posted : 14 Jun, 2013 07:38 AM

David lived under the Old Covenant and was of coursing speaking of the Law of Moses - see for example verses 97-98



"Oh, how I love your law!

I meditate on it all day long.

Your commands are always with me

and make me wiser than my enemies"



Christians are no longer under the Law.

Post Reply

dljrn04

View Profile
History
None but a child of God could take up this expression.
Posted : 15 Jun, 2013 05:00 AM

2 timothy 3:16 For the whole Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable to teach, to convince, to correct, and to instruct in righteousness

Post Reply

DontHitThatMark

View Profile
History
None but a child of God could take up this expression.
Posted : 17 Jun, 2013 08:21 AM

We're no longer "under" it, it might be good to define what "under" means. I consider it to be our foundation instead of our condemnation. It's under us instead of over us.



The law points out sin. Sin is the transgression of the law. And while Paul does say we're no longer "under" the law, he also says, that as new creatures, we should no longer continue in sin.



:peace::peace:

Post Reply

DontHitThatMark

View Profile
History
None but a child of God could take up this expression.
Posted : 17 Jun, 2013 08:28 AM

Logically...the law has a part to play in the christian's life. And by "law", I mean God's 10 commandments.



"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."



"For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven."



:peace::peace:

Post Reply

DontHitThatMark

View Profile
History
None but a child of God could take up this expression.
Posted : 17 Jun, 2013 08:32 AM

There are laws that were done away with at the cross, such as circumcision and food laws, etc. Paul talks about the laws that were for the "jews" quite extensively. It's very clear when he says "circumcision" is no longer required, but I don't see him say that "stealing" is allowed now.



:peace::peace:

Post Reply